Nano & US university patents : strong Californian leadership, Rice University comes second

Posted on September 11, 2010 by nanocolors

This chart was built by searching the Espacenet database for patents

1) mentionning the prefix “nano” in their title or abstract

2) mentionning “univ”, the [US] country code, and the name of the university in the “applicant” field

3) without any restriction of publication year

Only the top 10 most visible US universities according to these criteria are presented in the chart.

Nano & US university patents : strong Californian leadership, Rice … | The law and You, on September 11, 2010 at 8:12 am said:

[...] posted here: Nano & US university patents : strong Californian leadership, Rice … Related Posts:Nano Patents and Innovations: World's First Transcontinental …Nano Patents [...]
Patents » Nano & US university patents : strong Californian leadership, Rice …, on September 11, 2010 at 10:39 am said:

[...] Read more: Nano & US university patents : strong Californian leadership, Rice … [...]
Jo La, on October 10, 2010 at 8:10 am said:

I do also know Stanford and USC are doing a lot in nanotechnology and filing patents
nanocolors, on October 10, 2010 at 8:36 am said:

True ; I’m only showing the top ten (in number of patents) here, Stanford and USC rank farther down but are nevertheless pretty active in nanotechnology patenting.

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Nanocolors – the nanotech 2.0 hub